Global Warming Truth
&
Globalist Fraud
First - Global Warming
Had NOTHING To Do With
Hurricane Sandy

Weather War? Huuummmmmmmm?


by Jim Searcy, BSME, P.E.

Qualified to sign in the Global Warming Petition Project


Between 1999 and 2007, the list of QUALIFIED signatories grew gradually, without a special campaign.
Between October 2007 and March 2008, a new campaign for signatures was initiated.
The majority of the current listed signatories signed or re-signed the petition after October 2007.
More will be found at the end of this article.

Double Click Here to Hear
The ONE Audio Message For THE WHOLE TRUTH
About
 The Antichrist Agenda of The Global Warming FRAUD

The
TRUE 15 to 1 Scientific Consensus IS
That CO2 Has NO Adverse Effect on Climate Temperature
15 to 1 The Sun Drives Climate Change
CO2 is IRRELEVANT

More CO2 (if the effect could be measured) would probably Reduce global warming

31,486 American QUALIFIED
Scientists have signed this petition,
including 9,029 with PhDs
Compare THAT with the 2,500 Bureaucrats
Falsely So-Called Scientists
Who have used NOW PROVEN
FRAUDULENT data, fudging programs,
and racketeering, to promote the LIE
& FRAUD of Anthropogenic or CO2 driven Global Warming


The debate on global warming is over,
not because it was never allowed to be started,
but because The Inconvenient Truth
is that every global warming fact stated by Al Gore
in his fiction Movie has been PROVEN FALSE.
Click Here for the Sound Track PROOF
The Global Warming Swindle

I have personally been writing about the FRAUD of Anthropogenic Global Warming for 20 years. Even the 700 page commentary on the Old Testament in chronological order, published in 1989, mentions it. In 1989 I called ozone depletion and global warming - HORSEFEATHERS,
on page 14 of that book which one may read at this link.

Click here for the HORSEFEATHERS Song.

Finally, after 20 years, we can see the evidence, and there is conclusive proof that CO2 related global warming is FRAUD. The idea that CO2 causes global warming is nothing but antichrist agenda HORSEFEATHERS. The vindication of correctly calling CO2 related global warming an antichrist fraud is official. The historical record of atmospheric carbon dioxide, (CO2), concentrations, claimed by Al Gore and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (IPCC), regarding WHY emission of CO2 MUST be reduced, is 100% PURE FRAUD.


How does one illustrate
FUDGING, CHEATING, TRICKING, DECEIVING, or LYING
here is a typical example
of how the CRU and/or IPCC does
their Science Falsely so-called.



The world warmed at the same rate from 1860-1880 and from 1910-1940 as it did
from 1975-1998, as the three magenta trend-lines demonstrate.

The earlier two periods occurred BEFORE humankind and/or CO2 can possibly
have had any significant influence on temperature.
Therefore there is NO anthropogenic signal in the global temperature record.
There is NO scientific basis whatsoever for the assertion by the UN's climate panel
that the warming rate is accelerating.

The FUDGED fraudulent CRU or UN's IPCC distortion of this true picture
represents a pictorial LIE, deliberately intended to DECEIVE.

The Next Chart
Proves One of the Most
Inconvenient Truths
Of All About Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
CO2 is so GOOD
and VITAL to Plant & Animal Life
That CO2 has been VERY
ACCURATELY MEASURED
For a Long Time

The TRUE CO2 ppm levels CHEMICALLY
MEASURED RECORDS have been BURIED
so the IPCC could use FRAUD
fudged CO2 ice core data.

Professor Beck has for a long time been reviewing more than 90,000 accurate chemical analyses of CO2 in air since 1812. The historic chemical data reveal that changes in CO2 track changes in temperature, and therefore climate in contrast to the simple, monotonically increasing CO2 trend depicted in the post-1990 literature on climate-change. Since 1812, the CO2 concentration in northern hemispheric air has fluctuated exhibiting three high level maxima around 1825, 1857 and 1942 the latter showing more than 400 ppm.

 

 

 

WHO IS WATCHING THE COOKIE JAR ???

 


Excellent Summary of
CLIMATEGATE

Follows
Thanks to Christopher Monckton


A tiny clique of politicized scientists, paid by unscientific politicians with whom they were financially and politically linked, were responsible for gathering and reporting data on temperatures from the palaeoclimate to today’s climate. The “Team”, as they called themselves, were bending and distorting scientific data to fit a nakedly political story-line profitable to themselves and congenial to the governments that, these days, pay the bills for 99% of all scientific research.


CLIMATEGATE
ITS THE HEAT SOURCE STUPID


A tiny clique of politicized scientists, paid by unscientific politicians with whom they were financially and politically linked, were responsible for gathering and reporting data on temperatures from the palaeoclimate to today’s climate. The “Team”, as they called themselves, were bending and distorting scientific data to fit a nakedly political story-line profitable to themselves and congenial to the governments that, these days, pay the bills for 99% of all scientific research.


The Climate Research Unit at East Anglia had profited to the tune of at least $20 million in “research” grants from the Team’s activities.


 The Team had tampered with the complex, bureaucratic processes of the UN’s climate panel, the IPCC, so as to exclude inconvenient scientific results from its four Assessment Reports, and to influence the panel’s conclusions for political rather than scientific reasons.


The Team had conspired in an attempt to redefine what is and is not peer-reviewed science for the sake of excluding results that did not fit what they and the politicians with whom they were closely linked wanted the UN’s climate panel to report.


 They had tampered with their own data so as to conceal inconsistencies and errors.


They had emailed one another about using a “trick” for the sake of concealing a “decline” in temperatures in the paleoclimate.


 They had expressed dismay at the fact that, contrary to all of their predictions, global temperatures had not risen in any statistically-significant sense for 15 years, and had been falling for nine years. They had admitted that their inability to explain it was “a travesty”. This internal doubt was in contrast to their public statements that the present decade is the warmest ever, and that “global warming” science is settled.


They had interfered with the process of peer-review itself by leaning on journals to get their friends rather than independent scientists to review their papers.


They had successfully leaned on friendly journal editors to reject papers reporting results inconsistent with their political viewpoint.


They had campaigned for the removal of a learned journal’s editor, solely because he did not share their willingness to debase and corrupt science for political purposes.


They had mounted a venomous public campaign of disinformation and denigration of their scientific opponents via a website that they had expensively created.


Contrary to all the rules of open, verifiable science, the Team had committed the criminal offense of conspiracy to conceal and then to destroy computer codes and data that had been legitimately requested by an external researcher who had very good reason to doubt that their “research” was either honest or competent.

 

The following is a FUTURE LOOK at the chief promoter of the FRAUD,
who has picked up a known $350 Million and a NOBEL PEACE PRIZE,
since leaving the Clinton Administration,
for promoting the Fraud.

 


 

 

HYPOCRISY IN GRAPHIC FORM

 

 

Here is a quick Look at the TRUTH
and KNOWN Scientific Facts



More CO2 Will Probably HELP SOLVE
the Global Warming Problem



 

CO2 Going UP and Climate Temperature Going DOWN
The Job of the CRU and IPCC is HIDE THE DECLINE



The CRU and/or IPCC produced the Famous FRAUD
of the FUDGED Hockey Stick Graph to
HIDE THE DECLINE
NOW Proven to be 100% pure Bull Hockey


America's largest university meteorology department is at Penn State University. Professor Michael Mann is employed as professor of meteorology at Penn State. Professor Michael Mann has recently been exposed for 'tricking data' in CRU documents recently released in what is now known as Climategate. Mann is responsible for developing the famous hockey stick diagram of historical global temperatures used in Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth. This was designed to highlight abrupt warming in the past century that looks like a hockey stick on a timeline. WE NOW KNOW THAT IS NOT TRUE. The diagram is PURE FRAUD. Michael Mann's fudging, or trick, or LIE, made parts of past climate data history of extremes seem to disappear. Michael Mann's falsification of historic climate data was intentionally done to exaggerate any warming in recent years. Those at East Anglia University, UK, (CRU), have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data, thereby making it IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to check, verify, prove or disprove, the basic calculations, which have been presented to IPCC bureaucrats to show long-term climate temperature warming over the past 150 years.

Here is the e-mail that was sent from Professor Phil Jones at CRU to the authors of the hockey stick chart. In it, credit is given to Mike for his 'trick' to manipulate and fudge the data to HIDE THE DECLINE:

Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim's got a diagram here we'll send that either later today or first thing tomorrow. I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith's to HIDE THE DECLINE. (emphasis added) Mike's series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999 for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.
Cheers
Phil
Prof. Phil Jones

Where I attended university to obtain a degree in science, that old school taught that HIDING, or FUDGING, the results to make them DIFFERENT than the data prove, or CHANG & HIDE the TRUTH, was a BIG NO NO. On Dec 1, 2009, we got the news that Professor Phil Jones has agreed to step down from his position at the Climate Research Unit, (CRU) that supplies the science falsely so-called for the UN bureaucrats at the IPCC. There is a TRUE scientific consensus. It should be universal, but it is 15 to 1, thus proving 1 of 16 scientists can be deceived, deceiving, deceivers themselves. IT IS THE HEAT SOURCE STUPID should ring a bell for Al Gore and all his deceived followers. How ironic that the self-proclaimed "inventor of the internet" could be brought down and finally exposed for the fraud that he is, by some hackers using the internet he once said he invented.

It is not what is being warmed or cooled the makes the difference. CO2 HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GLOBAL WARMING. All Anthropogenic Global Warming proponents could just as well spend their time and efforts trying to blow out the sun. The true scientific consensus is at least 15 to 1 in affirming and confirming the truth that CO2 has NOTHING to do with global warming.


 



Fake data or not, if earth climate temperatures increase or decrease, the reason IS THE HEAT SOURCE STUPID. However, what drives the science falsely so-called is to STEAL, KILL, and DESTROY. All the Carbon Tax and Cap and Trade laws for the whole world will NOT have any CHANGE of climate temperature - ZERO, ZIP, NADA. The change would be impossible to detect without FUDGING, LYING, TRICKS, and DECEIT because IT IS THE HEAT SOURCE STUPID. It is not what gets heated or cooled. It angers me that such high priced LYING is falsely so-called science. Removing or HIDING the truth in anything called science, makes such science falsely so-called. 1 Tim 6:20 says - keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:

All the "tricks" to support a "global warming" scam have now been exposed. It is an "Inconvenient Truth" that all of the "Global Warming" proponents have been DECEIVED, DECEIVING, DECEIVERS, all along. Therefore the liars for hire, falsely so-called scientists, must NOW "Hide the Decline" in the climate temperature for this earth has actually COOLED since 1998. The debate which was never allowed is over. The falsely so-called scientist liars for hire scamsters have been hired to help Al Gore and his partners at Kliner Perkins who expected to make a fortune on Cap & Trade and Carbon taxing laws. Remember, always FOLLOW THE MONEY!!!






Historic Climate Change Reality
 



Now the proof is in that CO2 related GLOBAL WARMING is PROVEN FRAUD. The proof and evidence of the FRAUD came with the recently hacked or leaked emails exposed from within the Climate Research Unit, (CRU). The general tone of the emails is one of fraud and conspiracy. The leaks demonstrated that many insider scientists were conspiring to block publication of dissenting views in peer-reviewed journals, that there was data-fudging, and deliberate evasion of Freedom Of Information requests, perhaps even including deliberate destruction of data. The computer models themselves have already been shown by many computer programmers reviewing the leaked information, to be RIGGED, not just flawed. These CRU files describe a subversive effort to corrupt climate data, control what papers appear in the scientific journals, trashing reputations of those who disagree, and even getting scientists fired, simply because they disagreed with the FRAUDULENT theory. That the emails, source code, and data is GENUINE has already been ADMITTED by the sources of the emails, codes, and data. The genuineness of the PROOF has been verified by several individuals with direct involvement in the emails, from both sides of the argument, that the information is genuine, which PROVES the Anthropogenic Global Warming to be 100% PURE FRAUD.

 

The CRU team began to produce work that contradicted the established picture in 1990 - and CRU was able to do so from both ends. By creating new temperature recreations, it could create a new account of history. By issuing a monthly gridded temperature set while making raw station data unavailable for inspection, it defined contemporary data. So CRU controlled two important narratives: the "then", and the "now".

 

Please allow me to give you a few easily verifiable facts and truths regarding Global Warming:

1) The antichrist prince of the power of the air, who will soon be indwelt by the father of lies, Satan himself, says that laws to reduce CO2 is the single most important issue that all governments MUST IMMEDIATELY act upon. HORSEFEATHERS.

2) Such action will bring the starvation of literally hundreds of millions of people because all plant life grows from use of the CO2. Plants take out the Carbon for the plant's growth and give back Oxygen, which all animals need to breathe. Wonderfully smart how God set it up that way.

3) CO2 has NOTHING to do with global warming.

4) Global warming is totally dependant upon the heat source, the sun. The sun goes through normal predictable cycles of increasing and decreasing sun spot or solar radiation activity on an approximately 11 year cycle.

4) If global warming from CO2 were true, and it is NOT, but if it were true, the melting of the polar ice caps will NOT raise the sea level. Prove this to yourself quite simply. Fill a glass with ice cubes, then carefully fill the glass with water until it is brim full. Watch what happens when the ice floating above the brim full glass melts. The water level in the glass will go DOWN. Yes, this is definitely one to try at home, and have another laugh at Al Gore, the antichrist prince of the power of the air, and the liars for hire falsely so-called scientists at the CRU and IPCC.

5) For the last 16 years we have had NO global warming.

6) For the last 9 years, though the CRU and IPCC have been doing their best to hide the decline, the truth is that we have experienced GLOBAL COOLING for the last 9 years.

7) The science on global warming is NOT settled. What is settled is the conclusions, which the antichrist prince of the power of the air, wants the liars for hire at the CRU and IPCC to conclude. The purpose is to use the fraudulent conclusions of the CRU so that the prince can become the most notorious tax raiser of all time. Literally taxing the air that we need to breathe. Dan 11:20

8) True science says global warming is a FRAUD, designed to advance the antichrist global controller agenda.

9) Adding $5,000 to everyone’s annual electric bill in CO2 taxes, and another $5,000 per year on auto fuel taxes, to cut CO2 emissions by half WILL NOT REDUCE THE CLIMATE TEMPERATURE BY A SINGLE DEGREE. Cutting CO2 emissions, even eliminating them all together, will NOT effect Climate temperature one whit. Total elimination of CO2 emissions on Climate temperature will have NO effect on Climate temperature, ZERO, ZIP, NADA. At the same time hundreds of millions will starve, and billions who now live comfortably, will be reduced to abject poverty.

10) Garbage in yields garbage out. The planned Luciferian antichrist garbage output of lies to tax, control, kill, and destroy has been the planned garbage output fraud scheme of this science falsely so-called from the beginning of global warming antichrist politics.

 

Here is another good home experiment that most never need to do, but can think this through to perfection without even having to run the test. Someone should tell Al Gore and all of the rest of the people who think CO2 causes global warming to try this. Take 2 IDENTICAL cardboard boxes. One has just air in it. And the other has more than 50% CO2. Wire a 100 watt incandescent light bulb in each box. Which one will warm faster and/or  get hotter? You got it right - both the same. Plus you do NOT have to worry about the CO2 filled box catching on fire. IT IS THE HEAT SOURCE STUPID. The CO2 has NOTHING to do with it. IT IS THE HEAT SOURCE STUPID. Al Gore will like the ring to that one being part of the Bill Clinton administration.  

 

One verse explains it so well - Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

 

Remember, Lucifer's commandment Number One, is to kill and/or reduce the population of earth from above 6.7 Billion people to just one half billion people. That means, according to the top priority of Luciferians like Al Gore, Hillary, and Obama, that 93% of the people on this planet have got to go. Now, if Al Gore and his Luciferian fellow travelers plan to kill over 6 BILLION people, what hesitation would such Luciferians have, to promote a few lies of falsely so-called science? Yes, you probably have figured that the Bush-Clinton-Bush syndicate of sudden destruction, including Hillary, and Nobel prize winners Al Gore & Obama, intend to start that killing of 93% of all of the people with those "not authentically human" Jews and REAL Christians.

 

If you do not believe that this is the Number one goal of Luciferians like the Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton syndicate of sudden destruction, Obama, and Al Gore too, just click here to see it chiseled into stone -

http://www.moresureword.com/luciferten.htm
Note: Here is a seven minute video confirming the Luciferian global genocide eugenics agenda which motivates the Anthropogenic Global Warming FRAUD http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTd5fKYcR3M&feature=related
 

If you would like to have a FUN way to communicate the TRUTH about the global warming FRAUD the work of www.M4GW.com is the BEST that I have seen and I would highly recommend M4GW to everyone:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJUFTm6cJXM&feature=related

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TF5F6eYho8U&feature=related


 

GoogleGate

What is Google doing about CLIMATEGATE?
The term CLIMATEGATE was coined 11/19/2009
Google Search count Data Collection started 11/23/2009
These graphs result from a Google Advanced Search
for previous 24 hour period with the word CLIMATEGATE
began on Nov 23 – Same time 24 hour advanced
Google search hit almost 35 Million on Dec 5, 2009

Obama said it did not matter or change what he would
do to get Carbon taxes for everyone when he want
to pick up his Nobel Prize as Gore had done before him.

NEXT DAY same Google Search for CLIMATEGATE
dropped from almost 35 Million to just over 0.1 Million
TOMORROW???

 

Did Google get Obamaed or did Obama get Googled?


 

 

Professor Beck’s work confirms an abundance of previous investigations which demonstrate that the IPCC picked its data in a selective and fraudulent manner to attempt to prove that we must stop industrial development, and return to pre-industrial revolution age ways of living, (for all but the elite Luciferian global control freaks), or else face oppressive heat and melting of the polar ice caps. It shows that the Kyoto Treaty on reduction of greenhouse gases was based on a scientific FRAUD, which violates the laws of the universe, denying the well-established determination of climate, by cyclical variations in the Earth-Sun orbital relationship, and in the Sun’s radiation output.

 

In a thorough review of 175 scientific papers, Professor Beck proves that the founders of modern greenhouse theory, Guy Stewart Callendar and Charles David Keeling, Al Gore’s favorite, had completely ignored the true scientific and systematic measurements by some of the most famous names of physical chemistry, including several Nobel chemistry prize winners. Measurements by these chemists showed that today’s atmospheric CO2 concentration of about 380 parts per million (ppm) have been EXCEEDED in the past, including a period from 1936 to 1944, when the CO2 levels varied from 393.0 to 454.7 ppm. There were also measurements, accurate to within 3%, of 375.0 ppm in 1885, 390.0 in 1866, and 416.0 in 1857 and 1858.

 

Ironically, although the 1940s increase correlated with a period of average atmospheric warming, Beck and others have shown that the warming came BEFORE the increase in CO2 concentrations. You may find verification of these scientific records at -  http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com - under topic Global Warming.

 

The data reviewed by Beck came from all over the northern hemisphere from rural areas or outside of towns without contamination by industry, at a measuring height of approximately 2 meters above ground. Evaluation of chemical methods revealed a maximum error of 3% down to 1% in the best cases. By contrast, the measurements of the global warming fraud team, taken from ice cores, show a rather steady increase in CO2 levels. That is the reason for this STRANGE measuring concept, because of the way one may conveniently fit the data so derived, to correspond to the PRECONCEIVED idea that increasing industrial activity has produced a steady CO2 increase.

 

According to the greenhouse warming theory, the increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration caused by human activity, such as burning of fossil fuels, acts like the glass in a greenhouse to prevent the re-radiation of solar heat from near the Earth’s surface. Although such an effect exists, carbon dioxide is low on the list of greenhouse gases accounting for, AT MOST, 2 or 3 percent of the greenhouse effect.

 

By far the most important greenhouse gas is water vapor. However, water in the form of clouds can reflect back solar radiation, causing temperature reduction. There are so many interrelated effects, that correlating global temperature to CO2 concentration is about like trying to predict how many inches of rain you will have next year by counting the number of toothpicks in your toothpick holder.

 

To fabricate a convincing case of such an interrelationship requires a great deal of sophisticated LYING. According to Professor Beck, Dr. Jaworowski, and many other reputable scientists, the greenhouse theorists have been CAUGHT at an absurd SCAM. Now the hacked internal emails from the group of liars for hire in the CRU, prove the global warming FRAUD absolutely.

 

Our modern understanding of photosynthesis began when Jan Baptist van Helmont began to weigh a plant and its soil before and after growth. Van Helmont discovered, way back in about 1620 AD, that the SOIL supporting a willow tree, which had grown to 169 pounds in five years, had changed weight by less than a few ounces. So where did the tree get all that weight and size increase from, if it was measurably confirmed, that it did NOT come from the soil? Though Van Helmont mistakenly had concluded that the plant’s mass had come solely from the water applied, by about 1850 AD, it was proven fact that the mass of the plant comes from the invisible, and seemingly weightless air, particularly the carbon dioxide contained in the air.

 

Unfortunately for Al Gore, the Luciferians, the antichrist prince of the power of the air, and the liars at the IPCC, the measurement of atmospheric CO2 concentration had been a special focus of chemists since that early 19th Century. There has been very much study and good scientific historical research and data collection, to understand the process of photosynthesis. These carefully recorded measurements of CO2 are a matter of long standing record to put great light of truth upon this last day Luciferian antichrist fraud.

 

How many might have put their emotional energy into getting likes of Obama, Hillary and Al Gore elected because they want to do something to stop global warming? Will they be angry when they realize how they have been deceived by the very ones they were working so hard to promote?

 

In any discussion of global warming, either in the scientific literature or in the mainstream media, the outcome is always predetermined.

 

There is now extensive evidence of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) blatant FRAUD. They have effectively ripped off the peer review process to enforce the CRU fraudulent global warming dogma. Peer review is the practice of subjecting scientific papers to review by other scientists with relevant expertise before they can be published in professional journals. Peer review has, except for the global warming issue, been the normal way of confirming or challenging any scientific theory. There is extensive evidence of FRAUD within the CRU. The CRU has bullied the entire peer review process to prevent any legitimate challenge, or criticism, or exposure of the CRU fraudulent manipulation of the data.

 

One can also see from these e-mails the scientists' panic at any dissent appearing in the scientific literature. Not content to block out all dissent from scientific journals, the CRU scientists also conspired to secure friendly reviewers who could be counted on to rubber-stamp the CRU work. Phil Jones suggests such a list to Kevin Trenberth, with the assurance that "All of them know the sorts of things to say...without any prompting."

 

Professor Beck’s proof of the Al Gore global warming scam, seems to have been poufed off of the internet. We have obtained a copy without his charts, and do have a copy of the most significant chart in his unofficial extract of E-G Beck's comprehensive draft paper that really nails this Luciferian CO2 global warming scam. If you have need of that proof, it could be emailed to you in an attachment file.

 

The Word of God agrees with the more than 31,000 scientists who have signed a petition circulated by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine saying, in part, “there is NO convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.” Only those with legitimate degrees in SCIENCE, B.S., M.S., Ph.D’s from accredited universities are allowed as signers of the petition. Compare that with the 2500 liars for hire at the IPCC. If there is a genuine scientific consensus that consensus is 15 to one that CO2 has absolutely NO effect on Climate temperature and that the true scientific evidence says that increases in atmospheric CO2 produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environment on planet Earth.

 

The Word of God also agrees with the similar skepticism of surveys of climatologists that increasing CO2 levels would be anything other than an INSIGNIFICANT cause of global warming.

 

The most reliable sources of temperature data agree with the Word of God in showing no global warming trend. According to the Word of God, which true science can not help but verify, global warming WILL HAPPEN WITHOUT ANY TREND. Global warming will happen and there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING THAT ALL THE PEOPLE OF EARTH CAN DO TO PREVENT IT. It will happen without trend, and without precedent.

 

It is the devil and his antichrist Luciferian global control freaks, which want all men to be deceived regarding its cause and certainty. God’s people, who KNOW what God said about global warming, will NOT let their heart be troubled about it. God’s people will KNOW that ALL people with all their machines running, or shut down, can have absolutely NO effect regarding global warming. God’s people will KNOW man has NO capability whatsoever to prevent it or change the more sure word, which is written on the issue. God’s people will KNOW NOT to be moved by fear of it, but will be moved by faith, and even see their faith be confirmed by it.  

 

According to the Word of God the basis for ALL predictions of global warming, which are ALL are based on computer models, are folly. In actual fact, in order to get their models to produce predictions that are close to their designers’ expectations, modelers resort to “flux adjustments” that can be 25 times larger than the effect of doubling carbon dioxide concentrations. The antichrist media, and antichrist politicians, want everyone to believe that CO2 is the supposed trigger for global warming. However, CO2, in fact, and according to the Word of God, is ridiculous as a global warming trigger. CO2 is absolutely NOT a factor of any real significance. It is an antichrist Luciferian globalist tool of manipulation and control. Even Dr. Richard A. Kerr, a writer for the prestigious journal of Science, says “climate modelers have been ‘cheating’ for so long it’s almost become respectable.”

 

The IPCC did NOT prove that human activities are causing global warming. The IPCC proved they can work FRAUD for the globalists. The IPCC is frequently quoted like it is Al Gore's proof text. Yet, few who quote it really know what the IPCC's latest report on Climate Change 2001, actually says about predicting the future climate: “The Earth’s atmosphere-ocean dynamics is chaotic: its evolution is sensitive to small perturbations in initial conditions. This sensitivity limits our ability to predict the detailed evolution of weather; inevitable errors and uncertainties in the starting conditions of a weather forecast amplify through the forecast. As well as uncertainty in initial conditions, such predictions are also degraded by errors and uncertainties in our ability to represent accurately the significant climate processes.”

 

Temperatures during the Medieval Warm Period (roughly 800 to 1200 AD), which allowed the Vikings to settle presently inhospitable Greenland, were higher than even the worst-case scenario reported by the IPCC. The period from Creation to 3000 BC, known as the “climatic optimum,” was even warmer and marked “a time when mankind began to build its first civilizations,” observe James Plummer and Frances B. Smith in a study for Consumer Alert. They said, “There is good reason to believe that a warmer climate would have a similar effect on the health and welfare of our own far more advanced and adaptable civilization today.”

 

The Word of God and true science and economics prove the folly of the Kyoto Protocol. Efforts to quickly reduce human greenhouse gas emissions would be VERY costly and will NOT effect the Earth’s climate. Reducing U.S. carbon dioxide emissions to 7 percent below 1990’s levels by the year 2012, the target set by the Kyoto Protocol, would require HIGHER energy TAXES and regulations causing the nation to lose 2.4 million jobs, and $300 BILLION in annual economic output. Average household income nationwide would fall by $2,700, and state tax revenues would decline by $93.1 billion due to less taxable earned income and sales, and lower property values. Full implementation of the Kyoto Protocol by all participating nations would reduce global temperature in the year 2100 by ZERO, ZIP, NADA. It is FOLLY, pure folly to lose 2,400,000 American jobs, and take $225.00 per MONTH out of EVERY household in America for 0 degrees in Climate temperature change? FOLLY, pure Luciferian globalist political fraud and FOLLY, is the right description of the Kyoto Treaty or Protocol to control of CO2. Incredibly, most states nevertheless persist in backing unnecessary and expensive greenhouse gas reduction programs. New Jersey, for example, collects $358 million a year in utility taxes to fund greenhouse gas reduction programs. Such programs will have NO impact on global greenhouse gas emissions. All they do is destroy jobs and waste money.

 

The BEST strategy regarding global warming is to KNOW what God said about it, and believe what God said. The alternative to demands for immediate action to “stop global warming” is to tell the people who would rather believe Al Gore and his fellow traveler Luciferians is: That if they give up their homes and convince every other person on earth to run no machines, and even if they have every human being on earth sacrificed in the guillotines of the global antichrist Luciferian control freaks, it will have absolutely NO effect on global warming.

 

Yes, global warming is coming SOON. Yes, it is very real and there is NOTHING that all the people united together on planet earth can do about it. The wise will understand. The wicked will just plane NOT get it. Here is the truth of God on the soon coming global warming, and if anyone is foolish enough to think that all the people on planet earth can do ANYTHING to stop it, tell them whatever they think to do, makes no more sense than for them to try to blow out the sun. Reducing CO2 emissions to stop global warming is FOOLISH. It makes as much sense as all the people on earth to point their faces at the sun and blow real hard to try to blow out the sun. FOOLISH. FOOLISHNESS. Here is the TRUTH about the soon coming warning, and why all the efforts of every human on earth CAN NOT stop it, or prevent it.

 

This last word from the Word of God regarding the truth of the soon coming global warming should illustrate how foolish, and ungodly it is, for anyone to either worry about it, or even more foolishly, presume to think that all of the people on earth giving every thing they had, including their lives, and the lives of their families could prevent it. Yes, this is the truth about global warming, man can do NOTHING to stop or prevent it. God said so, He has the power, and all the puny men, and all their demons, have NO power to change what God said He would send His angel to do. 

 

Rev 16:8-9 And the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire. And men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed the name of God, which hath power over these plagues: and they repented not to give him glory.

 

So if you are worried about global warming try blowing out the sun until you get sense enough to turn in repentance, and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. When one finds someone worried about global warming, one finds ignorance, and more often than not, foolishness. When one finds a so-called Christian pastor worried about global warming it is a shame. Perhaps those whose pastor is concerned about global warming should obey the command of the Lord in Rev 18:4.

 

 

Frequently Asked Questions

 

1. Is the Petition Project fulfilling expectations?

The project has fulfilled the expectations of its organizers. In PhD scientist signers alone, the project already includes 15-times more scientists than are seriously involved in the United Nations IPCC process. The very large number of petition signers demonstrates that, if there is a consensus among American scientists, it is in opposition to the human-caused global warming hypothesis rather than in favor of it.

Moreover, the current totals of 31,486 signers, including 9,029 PhDs, are limited only by Petition Project resources. With more funds for printing and postage, these numbers would be much higher.

2. Has the petition project helped to diminish the threat of energy and technology rationing?

The accomplishments of science and engineering have transformed the world. They have markedly increased the quality, quantity, and length of human life and have enabled human beings to make many improvements in the natural environment of the Earth.

Today, scientists are seeing the accomplishments of science demonized and one of the three most important molecular substances that make life possible - atmospheric carbon dioxide (the other two being oxygen and water) - denigrated as an atmospheric "pollutant" in a widely circulated movie. Scientists who have carefully examined the facts know that this movie contains numerous falsehoods. This and many other similar misguided propaganda efforts in the media, naturally repel men and women who know the truth. The search for truth is the essence of science. When science is misrepresented, scientists are naturally incensed.

There is, therefore, a rapidly growing backlash of opposition among American scientists to this egregious misuse of the reputation and procedures of science. The Petition Project is helping to demonstrate this opposition and, therefore, to reduce the chances of misguided political reductions in science-based technology.

3. Who organized the Petition Project?

The Petition Project was organized by a group of physicists and physical chemists who conduct scientific research at several American scientific institutions. The petition statement and the signatures of its 31,486 signers, however, speak for themselves. The primary relevant role of the organizers is that they are among the 9,029 PhD signers of the petition.

4. Who pays for the Petition Project?

The Petition Project is financed by non-tax deductible donations to the Petition Project from private individuals, many of whom are signers of the petition. The project has no financing whatever from industrial sources. No funds or resources of the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine are used for the Petition Project. The Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine has never received funds or resources from energy industries, and none of the scientists at the Institute have any funding whatever from corporations or institutions involved in hydrocarbon technology or energy production. Donations to the project are primarily used for printing and postage. Most of the labor for the project has been provided by scientist volunteers.

5. Does the petition list contain names other than those of scientist signers?

Opponents of the petition project sometimes submit forged signatures in efforts to discredit the project. Usually, these efforts are eliminated by our verification procedures. On one occasion, a forged signature appeared briefly on the signatory list. It was removed as soon as discovered.

In a group of more than 30,000 people, there are many individuals with names similar or identical to other signatories, or to non-signatories – real or fictional. Opponents of the petition project sometimes use this statistical fact in efforts to discredit the project. For examples, Perry Mason and Michael Fox are scientists who have signed the petition – who happen also to have names identical to fictional or real non-scientists.

6. Does the petition project list contain duplicate names?

Thousands of scientists have signed the petition more than once. These duplicates have been carefully removed from the petition list. The list contains many instances of scientists with closely similar and sometimes identical names, as is statistically expected in a list of this size, but these signers are different people, who live at different addresses, and usually have different fields of specialization. Primarily as a result of name and address variants, occasional duplicate names are found in the list. These are immediately removed.

7. Are any of the listed signers dead?

In a group of more than 30,000 people, deaths are a frequent occurrence. The Petition Project has no comprehensive method by which it is notified about deaths of signatories. When we do learn of a death, an "*" is placed beside the name of the signatory. For examples, Edward Teller, Arnold Beckman, Philip Abelson, William Nierenberg, and Martin Kamen are American scientists who signed the Petition and are now deceased.

8. Why is this effort called "Petition Project?"

Signatories to the petition have signed just the petition – which speaks for itself. The organizers – themselves scientists located at several scientific institutions – have designed the project to emphasize this single fact. The use of a post office box mailing address, a generic name – Petition Project, and other institutionally-neutral aspects of the project are intended to avoid the impression that the signatories have endorsed the agenda or actions of any institution, group, or other activity. They are simply signers of this petition to the government of the United States, as written.

9. Why was the review article published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons?

The authors chose to submit this article for peer-review and publication by the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons because that journal was willing to waive its copyright and permit extensive reproduction and distribution of the article by the Petition Project.

10. Why is the Petition Project necessary?

In December 1997, then U. S. Vice-President Al Gore participated in a meeting in Kyoto, Japan during which he signed a treaty to ration world energy production based upon fear of human-caused global warming. This treaty was not, however, presented to the United States Senate for ratification.

Since before that Kyoto meeting and continuing to the present day, Mr. Gore and his supporters at the United Nations and elsewhere have claimed that the "science is settled" – that an overwhelming "consensus" of scientists agrees with the hypothesis of human-caused global warming, with only a handful of skeptical scientists in disagreement.

Moreover, for more than 10 years these proponents of world energy rationing have consistently argued that, in view of this claimed scientific "consensus," no further discussion of the science involved in this issue is warranted before legislative action is taken to heavily tax, regulate, and ration hydrocarbon energy.

Since, however, these claims were not successful in convincing the United States government to initiate energy rationing, the United Nations has held a series of international meetings attended by a central group of about 600 scientists, some additional scientists outside of this group, and a large number of political and bureaucratic representatives – approximately 2,000 in all. The United Nations has also hosted larger meetings, including many non-scientist participants from environmental, business, and political organizations.

During and after each of these meetings, there have been further publicity campaigns claiming that the "science is settled" – that the "consensus" of scientists in favor of the hypothesis of human-caused global warming is so overwhelming that further examination of the science is unnecessary.

Realizing, from discussions with their scientific colleagues, that this claimed "consensus" does not exist, a group of scientists initiated the Petition Project in early 1998. Thousands of signatures were gathered in a campaign during 1998-1999. Between 1999 and 2007, the list of petition signatories grew gradually, without a special campaign. Between October 2007 and March 2008, a new campaign for signatures was initiated. The majority of the current listed signatories signed or re-signed the petition after October 2007. The original review article that accompanied the petition effort in 1998-1999 was replaced in October 2007 with a new review incorporating the research literature up to that date.

The renewed petition campaign in 2007 was prompted by an escalation of the claims of "consensus," release of the movie "An Inconvenient Truth" by Mr. Al Gore, and related events. Mr. Gore's movie, asserting a "consensus" and "settled science" in agreement about human-caused global warming, conveyed the claims about human-caused global warming to ordinary movie goers and to public school children, to whom the film was widely distributed. Unfortunately, Mr. Gore's movie contains many very serious incorrect claims, which no informed, honest scientist could endorse.

The campaign to severely ration hydrocarbon energy technology has now been markedly expanded. In the course of this campaign, many scientifically invalid claims about impending climate emergencies are being made. Simultaneously, proposed political actions to severely reduce hydrocarbon use now threaten the prosperity of Americans and the very existence of hundreds of millions of people in poorer countries.

As Professor Seitz states, in his Petition Project letter which speaks of this impending threat to all humanity, "It is especially important for America to hear from its citizens who have the training necessary to evaluate the relevant data and offer sound advice."

The Petition Project is a means by which those citizens are offering that advice.

 Back to GJiGT Home Index Page